The Chronicle of Higher Education has a story today about how the MIT Press is essentially comparing peer review by blogging with traditional peer review in the preparation of an academic book. I think the article will be interesting to anyone who followed my series of blog posts that took a more or less academic look at the Iran NIE over the last several weeks. Currently the story appears to be "free". It may go behind their paywall soon, however, so if you are interested I would take a look at it today (unless you are a subscriber, obviously). Thanks, Barbara!